Here we go: ~
See-Through Church - Belgium
I ran across this on Andrew Sullivan's blog, who said, "that's one way to get more transparency in the church." Visually arresting; see the link for more photos:
Applying Sentiment Analysis to the Bible - OpenBible
An interesting image and idea, and something one could sit and study for quite some time... although I notice that the resurrection is listed as a negative event. Yeah, I guess Mark could be read that way...
The Roots of Religion - Big Questions Online
Myth, story, practice...
I have found that the very mention of the words “religion” and “evolution” sets off a kind of reflex reaction among some, but fortunately not all, contemporary Americans. Among both religious fundamentalists and what might be called atheistic fundamentalists these terms set off a war to the death, with abusive language directed toward the supposed opposition. In that kind of atmosphere any rational discussion becomes impossible. What unites these two groups is the idea that religion and science are essentially the same thing: sets of propositional truths that can be judged in terms of argument and evidence.
What surprised me when I began to read the work of leading scientists in the fields of cosmology and evolution is how many of them rejected this idea and argued instead that science and religion are really two different spheres that may at points overlap but that operate in accordance with different logics. Science operates with scientific method in terms of which different theories can be tested and proved or disproved, though if Karl Popper is right, proof is always problematic and we are safer to stick to disproof. Religion on the other hand is a way of life more than a theory. It is based on beliefs that science can neither prove nor disprove. Its “proof” is the kind of person the religious way of life produces.
Dying and Dinner Parties - Vimeo
Linked from the Improvised Life blog, this is a delightfully matter-of-fact take on the last adventure of life.
[vimeo http://www.vimeo.com/23135498 w=400&h=225]
An Interview with David Eagleman - BoingBoing
David and I were at Rice University at the same time, though I did not know him there. He's made the rounds on some of my favorite podcasts, including Radiolab, and his book Sum: Forty Tales of the Afterlives is really interesting. In this interview he tackles near-death experiences, déjà vu and more. When asked what advice he'd have for young aspiring scientists and thinkers, he says:
Watch TED talks: smart people will distill their life’s work down to 20 minutes for you. Follow links through infinite trajectories of Wikipedia. Watch educational videos on topics that resonate with you.
There are a million ways to waste time on the net; reject those in favor of ways that teach you exactly what you want to know. Never before have we enjoyed such an opportunity for tailored, individualized education.
And be sure to get off-line often, to take digital sabbaths. As much as the net provides a platter of mankind's learning, there is a different kind of learning to be had from a hike in the woods, the climbing of a tree, an afternoon building a dam in a stream.