Last week I wrote a guest post at Jan Edmiston's blog. Today Jan shares her space again for a great post. Larissa Kwong Abazia writes about the sticky (and in some cases illegal) questions that search committees have asked her in interviews:
I’ve recently started interviewing for ministry positions and felt I was prepared for the onslaught of what I deem “inappropriate questions” from churches. As a 30-something woman of color, I am familiar with comments that pose doubts about my age or experience, ability to minister to people older than me, slotting me right into youth ministry roles, assuming that hiring me will automatically grow the young adult population, or blatant misunderstandings surrounding race. I’ve learned to take them as par for the course, as sad as it may seem in the life of the Church. I was not ready, however, for questions surrounding my role as a mother.
Every single interview (Did you read that? EVERY SINGLE INTERVIEW) that I have had in the past several months has included some form of the question, “How do you feel about going back to work?” or “What will your son do once you start working?”
I started to comment on the post but it got long. I want to give Larissa's post a hearty "Yes... and."
Every person's experience is different. I know many women who have experienced a level of sexism, paternalism, and intrusiveness that I simply have not. That said, I've been asked similar questions, though not in an interview setting. In almost every case, the person was asking out of curiosity, concern, and in good faith.
Curiosity: The idea of women serving as pastors is beyond a no-brainer for me, but it's still new to many people. Many of them are not looking for a reason to weed you out, or a reason for you not to succeed. They are simply trying to picture how the life of the pastor works, what with night meetings and hospital emergencies. Our busiest times in ministry coincide with the school's winter break and spring break. (Fairfax County schedules spring break during Holy Week every flippin' year. Grrrr.) So... "how do you do that?" they want to know.
Concern: Many church people I meet are genuinely interested in the well-being of the pastor and her family. Many church folks get the stereotypes surrounding the minister's family---how kids are put under the microscope and spouses are expected to be a de facto "second pastor"---and conscientious ones want to mitigate that through expressions of care and concern.
Yes, in some cases, "How do you feel about going back to work?" is a trap. But not necessarily. Remember, the church is a community, a place where people care about people. Many people sitting on search committees have felt ambivalence about going back to work---and joy at being there. The question is not necessarily a wall. It can be a bridge.
Good faith: Again, I know women who have been the victim of appalling examples of sexism. That has not been my story, for whatever reason. I wonder all the time why that is. It could be that I'm simply clueless, that there's sexism going on and I'm not paying attention. Or I got lucky with the congregations I've served. Or I've decided to give people the benefit of the doubt, and when those potentially iffy questions and comments come my way I see it as someone trying to establish contact and relationship, albeit in a fumbling or even frustrating way. Probably it's a combination of all three.
(This is an aside, but I was asked some time ago how I view my leadership style as a woman---how do I understand authority and assertiveness, especially with people who may not be keen on a woman pastor? My approach is twofold:
1. a healthy dose of self-deprecating humor
2. really knowing my... stuff.
Both are vital. The former is what disarms one's detractors; the latter ensures that they can't write you off.)
Recently I highlighted a pair of articles that touched on issues of clergy health and clergy burnout. I suggested that the traditional understandings of authenticity, boundaries and pastor-parishioner friendship are changing as the demographics of pastors change. So how do questions like the ones Larissa writes about play into these changing boundaries?
Am I suggesting that religious communities should be allowed to ask illegal questions in interviews? Well, no. But I want search committees to care about work-life balance. And if I have children, their child-care arrangements are a part of that. That's just a fact.
It seems as though the underlying concern in [intrusive] questions is a distrust that a woman can care for her congregation if she is also a mother (and therefore caring for her family). Perhaps, then, congregations should consider if they are asking for too much time and energy from their leaders that won’t allow them to maintain healthy boundaries outside of the church. We aren’t parents of, but partners in ministry with our congregations. It’s long overdue that we begin thinking about the ways we support our clergy, male and female, in their calls in ways that allow them to be whole people both inside and outside of the church walls.
I completely agree with the second part (we are partners in ministry), but am not at all sold on the first part (the questions show distrust). Of course, it depends. But if we are partners in ministry, don't we have to hold one another accountable? Aren't questions about self-care part of accountability?
I guess I'm arguing for more questions, not fewer. They need to be good ones, of course, Generative ones. But ask. Ask everyone. Congregations should be similarly concerned about male pastors, with or without children. They should care about single parents, and single folks without children.
I want churches to care about, and ask about, the self-care of their leaders.